2002 Dodge Ram vs. 2011 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2011 Lotus Evora is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Ram. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Ram.
Because 2011 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Lotus Evora. (349 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Lotus Evora.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge Ram | 2011 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotus |
| Model | Ram | Evora |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5212 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 408 Nm | 349 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4341 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1222 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2576 mm |
