2002 Dodge Ram vs. 2013 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2013 Nissan Juke is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 3,906 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Juke (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Ram. (174 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 629 kg more than 2013 Nissan Juke.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (305 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Nissan Juke. (240 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Nissan Juke.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Ram | 2013 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Ram | Juke |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3906 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1441 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2530 mm |