2002 Dodge Ram vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC90 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Ram. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 281 kg more than 2002 Dodge Ram. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Ram | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Ram | XC90 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5212 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1879 kg | 2160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4807 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1784 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2857 mm |