2002 Dodge Razor vs. 1953 Holden FX
To start off, 2002 Dodge Razor is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Razor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Razor (251 HP) has 200 more horse power than 1953 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Razor should accelerate faster than 1953 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Razor weights approximately 165 kg more than 1953 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Razor (312 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Razor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Razor | 1953 Holden FX | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Razor | FX |
Year Released | 2002 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 312 Nm | 136 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2620 mm |