2002 Dodge Razor vs. 1953 Holden FX

To start off, 2002 Dodge Razor is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Razor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Razor (251 HP) has 200 more horse power than 1953 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Razor should accelerate faster than 1953 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Razor weights approximately 165 kg more than 1953 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Razor (312 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Razor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Dodge Razor 1953 Holden FX
Make Dodge Holden
Model Razor FX
Year Released 2002 1953
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2400 cc 2166 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 251 HP 51 HP
Torque 312 Nm 136 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1135 kg 970 kg
Vehicle Length 3770 mm 4380 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1230 mm 1580 mm
Wheelbase Size 2500 mm 2620 mm