2002 Dodge Razor vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2002 Dodge Razor is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Razor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Razor (251 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Razor should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Razor weights approximately 50 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Razor (312 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Razor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Razor | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Razor | Cedric |
Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 115 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2540 mm |