2002 Dodge Razor vs. 1972 Ford GT 40
To start off, 2002 Dodge Razor is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Razor. (251 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Razor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Razor weights approximately 175 kg more than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Razor (312 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Razor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Razor | 1972 Ford GT 40 | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Razor | GT 40 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 85 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2420 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 125 L |