2002 Dodge Razor vs. 1989 Volvo 240
To start off, 2002 Dodge Razor is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Razor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Razor (251 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1989 Volvo 240. (115 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Razor should accelerate faster than 1989 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Volvo 240 weights approximately 155 kg more than 2002 Dodge Razor.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Razor (312 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Volvo 240. (157 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Razor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Razor | 1989 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Razor | 240 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 157 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2660 mm |