2002 Dodge Razor vs. 1992 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2002 Dodge Razor is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 485 kg more than 2002 Dodge Razor.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Razor | 1992 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | Razor | Cougar |
Year Released | 2002 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 3798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1860 mm |