2002 Dodge Razor vs. 1999 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2002 Dodge Razor is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (321 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Razor. (251 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Razor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Charger weights approximately 227 kg more than 2002 Dodge Razor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge Razor | 1999 Dodge Charger | |
| Make | Dodge | Dodge |
| Model | Razor | Charger |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2400 cc | 4700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 321 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1362 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 4760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 68 L |
