2002 Dodge Razor vs. 2001 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2002 Dodge Razor is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Razor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Razor (251 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 2001 Smart ForTwo. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Razor should accelerate faster than 2001 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Razor weights approximately 315 kg more than 2001 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Razor | 2001 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Dodge | Smart |
Model | Razor | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Top Speed | 225 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 33 L |