2002 Dodge Razor vs. 2005 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2005 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Razor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Razor would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 592 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Razor. (251 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Razor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Razor weights approximately 55 kg more than 2005 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 678 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Dodge Razor. (312 Nm). This means 2005 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Dodge Razor.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge Razor | 2005 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotec |
| Model | Razor | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2400 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 843 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 990 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1150 mm |
