2002 Eagle Talon vs. 1955 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2002 Eagle Talon is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 100 kg more than 2002 Eagle Talon.
Because 1955 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Eagle Talon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Eagle Talon | 1955 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Eagle | Ford |
| Model | Talon | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4785 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 209 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1520 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3000 mm |
