2002 Eagle Talon vs. 1981 Mazda 626
To start off, 2002 Eagle Talon is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Eagle Talon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Eagle Talon weights approximately 375 kg more than 1981 Mazda 626.
Because 1981 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Eagle Talon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Eagle Talon | 1981 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Eagle | Mazda |
Model | Talon | 626 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 209 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2520 mm |