2002 Eagle Vision vs. 2003 Mazda 2

To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 2. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Eagle Vision weights approximately 490 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 2003 Mazda 2 has manual transmission. 2003 Mazda 2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Eagle Vision 2003 Mazda 2
Make Eagle Mazda
Model Vision 2
Year Released 2002 2003
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2700 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1570 kg 1080 kg
Vehicle Length 5320 mm 3930 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1550 mm