2002 Eagle Vision vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Eagle Vision weights approximately 1130 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Eagle Vision | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Eagle | Westfield |
Model | Vision | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1630 mm |