2002 Eagle Vision vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (256 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2002 Eagle Vision. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Eagle Vision weights approximately 85 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Eagle Vision | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Eagle | Mazda |
Model | Vision | 3 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |