2002 Eagle Vision vs. 2013 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2013 Chevrolet Malibu. (187 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 2013 Chevrolet Malibu. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Eagle Vision weights approximately 10 kg more than 2013 Chevrolet Malibu. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Eagle Vision | 2013 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Eagle | Chevrolet |
| Model | Vision | Malibu |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2700 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1854 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1462 mm |
