2002 Eagle Vision vs. 2013 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2013 Chrysler 200 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Chrysler 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chrysler 200 (279 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2002 Eagle Vision. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 2002 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chrysler 200 weights approximately 52 kg more than 2002 Eagle Vision. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Eagle Vision | 2013 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Eagle | Chrysler |
Model | Vision | 200 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 279 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1622 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2121 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1482 mm |