2002 Fiat Doblo vs. 1989 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 2002 Fiat Doblo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Jaguar XJS (235 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 2002 Fiat Doblo. (64 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 2002 Fiat Doblo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jaguar XJS weights approximately 530 kg more than 2002 Fiat Doblo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Doblo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Jaguar XJS (387 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Fiat Doblo. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1989 Jaguar XJS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Fiat Doblo. 1989 Jaguar XJS has automatic transmission and 2002 Fiat Doblo has manual transmission. 2002 Fiat Doblo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Jaguar XJS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Fiat Doblo | 1989 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Fiat | Jaguar |
Model | Doblo | XJS |
Year Released | 2002 | 1989 |
Body Type | Panel Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1248 cc | 3980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 387 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.9 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.9 mm | 102 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2600 mm |