2002 Fiat Siena vs. 1962 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2002 Fiat Siena is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Fiat Siena (122 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Siena should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Fiat Siena weights approximately 754 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Lotus Elan (138 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Fiat Siena. (87 Nm). This means 1962 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Fiat Siena | 1962 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Fiat | Lotus |
Model | Siena | Elan |
Year Released | 2002 | 1962 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1089 cc | 1496 cc |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 138 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1344 kg | 590 kg |