2002 Fiat Siena vs. 1965 Holden EH

To start off, 2002 Fiat Siena is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Fiat Siena (122 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1965 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Siena should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Fiat Siena weights approximately 159 kg more than 1965 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Holden EH (238 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Fiat Siena. (87 Nm). This means 1965 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Fiat Siena. 1965 Holden EH has automatic transmission and 2002 Fiat Siena has manual transmission. 2002 Fiat Siena will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1965 Holden EH will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: