2002 Fiat Siena vs. 1968 Ford 17
To start off, 2002 Fiat Siena is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 17 would be higher. At 2,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford 17 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford 17 (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2002 Fiat Siena. (122 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford 17 should accelerate faster than 2002 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Fiat Siena weights approximately 224 kg more than 1968 Ford 17.
Because 1968 Ford 17 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford 17. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford 17 (185 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Fiat Siena. (87 Nm). This means 1968 Ford 17 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Fiat Siena | 1968 Ford 17 | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Siena | 17 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1089 cc | 2293 cc |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1344 kg | 1120 kg |
