2002 Fiat Siena vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2002 Fiat Siena is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,287 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Fiat Siena (122 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Siena should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 66 (94 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Fiat Siena. (87 Nm). This means 1980 Volvo 66 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Fiat Siena. 1980 Volvo 66 has automatic transmission and 2002 Fiat Siena has manual transmission. 2002 Fiat Siena will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Volvo 66 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Fiat Siena | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | Siena | 66 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1089 cc | 1287 cc |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 94 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |