2002 Fiat Siena vs. 1986 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2002 Fiat Siena is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Fiat Siena (122 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1986 Ford Mustang. (88 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Siena should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Fiat Siena weights approximately 159 kg more than 1986 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1986 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Mustang (161 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Fiat Siena. (87 Nm). This means 1986 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Fiat Siena.

Compare all specifications: