2002 Fiat Siena vs. 1993 Ford Fairlane

To start off, 2002 Fiat Siena is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Ford Fairlane (198 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2002 Fiat Siena. (122 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2002 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 266 kg more than 2002 Fiat Siena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1993 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Ford Fairlane (348 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Fiat Siena. (87 Nm). This means 1993 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Fiat Siena. 1993 Ford Fairlane has automatic transmission and 2002 Fiat Siena has manual transmission. 2002 Fiat Siena will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1993 Ford Fairlane will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: