2002 Fiat Siena vs. 2001 Ford Puma
To start off, 2002 Fiat Siena is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Fiat Siena (122 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2001 Ford Puma. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Siena should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Fiat Siena weights approximately 309 kg more than 2001 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Puma (149 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Fiat Siena. (87 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Fiat Siena | 2001 Ford Puma | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Siena | Puma |
Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1089 cc | 1560 cc |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 149 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1344 kg | 1035 kg |