2002 Fiat Siena vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Fiat Siena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Fiat Siena would be higher. At 1,089 cc, 2002 Fiat Siena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Fiat Siena (122 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Siena should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Fiat Siena weights approximately 604 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Fiat Siena. (87 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Fiat Siena.

Compare all specifications: