2002 Fiat Stilo vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2002 Fiat Stilo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2002 Fiat Stilo. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2002 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 158 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Fiat Stilo | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Fiat | Sunbeam |
| Model | Stilo | Tiger |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 4259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 163 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 27 L |
