2002 Fiat Stilo vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2002 Fiat Stilo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2002 Fiat Stilo. (79 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2002 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 65 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 200 (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Fiat Stilo. (197 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1995 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Fiat Stilo.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Fiat Stilo | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Fiat | Rover |
Model | Stilo | 200 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 89 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1410 mm |