2002 Fiat Stilo vs. 2004 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2004 Ford Explorer is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Fiat Stilo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Fiat Stilo would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Explorer (239 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2002 Fiat Stilo. (113 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 2002 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 112 kg more than 2004 Ford Explorer.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Explorer (382 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Fiat Stilo. (255 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Fiat Stilo.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Fiat Stilo | 2004 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Stilo | Explorer |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 239 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4.6 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.5 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.6 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 85 L |