2002 Fiat Stilo vs. 2004 Pontiac Bonneville
To start off, 2004 Pontiac Bonneville is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Fiat Stilo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Fiat Stilo would be higher. At 4,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pontiac Bonneville (275 HP) has 174 more horse power than 2002 Fiat Stilo. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac Bonneville should accelerate faster than 2002 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 421 kg more than 2002 Fiat Stilo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Pontiac Bonneville (407 Nm) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Fiat Stilo. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Pontiac Bonneville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Fiat Stilo. 2004 Pontiac Bonneville has automatic transmission and 2002 Fiat Stilo has manual transmission. 2002 Fiat Stilo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Pontiac Bonneville will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Fiat Stilo | 2004 Pontiac Bonneville | |
Make | Fiat | Pontiac |
Model | Stilo | Bonneville |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 4556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 275 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 407 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.4 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1719 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.1 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 70 L |