2002 Ford Econoline vs. 1950 Simca 8
To start off, 2002 Ford Econoline is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Simca 8 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Econoline (198 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1950 Simca 8. (47 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1950 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1375 kg more than 1950 Simca 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Simca 8. (88 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Simca 8.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econoline | 1950 Simca 8 | |
Make | Ford | Simca |
Model | Econoline | 8 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 88 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2450 mm |