2002 Ford Econoline vs. 1978 Honda Prelude
To start off, 2002 Ford Econoline is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Honda Prelude. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Honda Prelude would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1405 kg more than 1978 Honda Prelude.
Because 2002 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Honda Prelude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Econoline | 1978 Honda Prelude | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Econoline | Prelude |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1978 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2330 mm |
