2002 Ford Econoline vs. 1982 Lamborghini Jalpa
To start off, 2002 Ford Econoline is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lamborghini Jalpa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lamborghini Jalpa would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Lamborghini Jalpa (252 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Lamborghini Jalpa should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 825 kg more than 1982 Lamborghini Jalpa.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lamborghini Jalpa. (314 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lamborghini Jalpa.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econoline | 1982 Lamborghini Jalpa | |
Make | Ford | Lamborghini |
Model | Econoline | Jalpa |
Year Released | 2002 | 1982 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3480 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 314 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2460 mm |