2002 Ford Econoline vs. 2000 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2002 Ford Econoline is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Yukon (283 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 35 kg more than 2000 GMC Yukon.
Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (481 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econoline | 2000 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Econoline | Yukon |
Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 5964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 283 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 481 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 2290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2950 mm |