2002 Ford Econoline vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2002 Ford Econoline is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Opel Omega would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Omega (305 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1015 kg more than 2000 Opel Omega.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Opel Omega (450 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2000 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Econoline | 2000 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Ford | Opel |
| Model | Econoline | Omega |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 5666 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1310 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2620 mm |
