2002 Ford Econoline vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon
To start off, 2002 Ford Econoline is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 815 kg more than 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Because 2002 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econoline | 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Econoline | Space Wagon |
Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
Body Type | Van | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2790 mm |