2002 Ford Econoline vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (215 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 609 kg more than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (311 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econoline | 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Econoline | CLK |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 311 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2860 mm |