2002 Ford Econoline vs. 2008 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XK is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XK (301 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 615 kg more than 2008 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XK (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2008 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econoline | 2008 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Econoline | XK |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2760 mm |