2002 Ford Econoline vs. 2008 Volkswagen Citi
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1467 kg more than 2008 Volkswagen Citi.
Because 2002 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volkswagen Citi. (141 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volkswagen Citi.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econoline | 2008 Volkswagen Citi | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | Econoline | Citi |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 141 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 858 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2410 mm |