2002 Ford Econoline vs. 2009 Audi A6
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A6 (252 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1025 kg more than 2009 Audi A6.
Because 2009 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A6. (330 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econoline | 2009 Audi A6 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Econoline | A6 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Van | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3123 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2770 mm |