2002 Ford Econoline vs. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (306 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 249 kg more than 2009 Land Rover Range Rover.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Econoline | 2009 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Ford | Land Rover |
| Model | Econoline | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 306 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 2076 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2890 mm |
