2002 Ford Econoline vs. 2010 Volvo S80
To start off, 2010 Volvo S80 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo S80 (311 HP @ 5950 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 446 kg more than 2010 Volvo S80.
Because 2010 Volvo S80 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo S80 (440 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econoline | 2010 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Econoline | S80 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5950 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1879 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4851 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1494 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2835 mm |