2002 Ford Econoline vs. 2011 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2011 Dodge Durango is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Dodge Durango (290 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Dodge Durango (352 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2011 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Econoline | 2011 Dodge Durango | |
| Make | Ford | Dodge |
| Model | Econoline | Durango |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 290 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 352 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5075 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1925 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3043 mm |
