2002 Ford Econoline vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (572 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 374 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (754 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 416 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econoline | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Econoline | Camaro |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 572 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 754 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2852 mm |