2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1951 Toyota SA
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Toyota SA would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Econovan (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1951 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1951 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econovan weights approximately 125 kg more than 1951 Toyota SA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Econovan | 1951 Toyota SA | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Econovan | SA |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1789 cc | 995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2410 mm |
