2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1953 Maserati A6GCS
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Maserati A6GCS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Maserati A6GCS (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Maserati A6GCS should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econovan weights approximately 715 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Econovan | 1953 Maserati A6GCS | |
| Make | Ford | Maserati |
| Model | Econovan | A6GCS |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 580 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2320 mm |
