2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1954 Porsche 356
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Econovan (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1954 Porsche 356. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1954 Porsche 356. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econovan weights approximately 480 kg more than 1954 Porsche 356. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econovan | 1954 Porsche 356 | |
Make | Ford | Porsche |
Model | Econovan | 356 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2110 mm |