2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1954 Studebaker Champion
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Studebaker Champion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Studebaker Champion would be higher. At 3,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Studebaker Champion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Studebaker Champion (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Studebaker Champion should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Studebaker Champion weights approximately 85 kg more than 2002 Ford Econovan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econovan | 1954 Studebaker Champion | |
Make | Ford | Studebaker |
Model | Econovan | Champion |
Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 3032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2970 mm |