2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1961 Renault 4
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Econovan (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1961 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1961 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econovan weights approximately 645 kg more than 1961 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econovan | 1961 Renault 4 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Econovan | 4 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2410 mm |